Skip to content

docs: align architecture guides with implementation - #661

Open
sbalabanov wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
sergeyb/docs-architecture-correctness
Open

docs: align architecture guides with implementation#661
sbalabanov wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
sergeyb/docs-architecture-correctness

Conversation

@sbalabanov

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Summary

Intent:

  • Keep the repository's canonical architecture guidance consistent with the current service and pipeline boundaries.
  • Distinguish durable snapshots, request-log projections, and queue wire formats accurately.

Changes:

  • Updated AGENTS.md and domain overviews for current controller, storage, queue, and Stovepipe behavior.
  • Corrected Gateway and Orchestrator lifecycle documentation and refreshed extension-specific guides.

Generated by the pr-create skill in devexp-agent-marketplace.

Test Plan

Issues

Summary:
Intent:
- Keep the repository's canonical architecture guidance consistent with the current service and pipeline boundaries.
- Distinguish durable snapshots, request-log projections, and queue wire formats accurately.

Changes:
- Updated AGENTS.md and domain overviews for current controller, storage, queue, and Stovepipe behavior.
- Corrected Gateway and Orchestrator lifecycle documentation and refreshed extension-specific guides.

---

Generated by the pr-create skill in devexp-agent-marketplace.
@CLAassistant

Copy link
Copy Markdown

CLA assistant check
Thank you for your submission! We really appreciate it. Like many open source projects, we ask that you sign our Contributor License Agreement before we can accept your contribution.
You have signed the CLA already but the status is still pending? Let us recheck it.

@sbalabanov
sbalabanov marked this pull request as ready for review September 1, 2026 21:56
@sbalabanov
sbalabanov requested review from a team and behinddwalls as code owners September 1, 2026 21:56
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants